![]() ![]() Just like in the first STAR WARS part, computer animations could have accompanied and supported these effects. Who knows, maybe the audience would have stayed back with open mouths in the armchairs? Because story and special effects would have balanced each other out and the effects would have looked really, really good. And with today’s knowledge, these effects would certainly have looked a lot better than in the old three parts. Not a single STAR WARS fan would have been sad if most of the effects in episodes 1 to 3 had been done by hand. The STAR WARS example shows perfectly that innovation does not necessarily mean revolution. That has class, is charming and a hundred times nicer to look at than sterile computer animations. And there is also a return to old, handmade special effects. Many directors became aware that successful CGI can never replace a gripping story. Today there is a counter-trend to the CGI flood. A fate shared by numerous movies of the 90s and noughties. The mass computer animations in episodes 1 to 3 simply distracted from the story. It quickly became clear what had gone wrong: You had forgotten that the most important thing in every movie is the plot – special effects are decorative accessories that don’t improve the story, but at best decorate it. The scenes may look fantastic, but they are so numerous, overloaded and in the focus of the action that the actual plot of the movies more or less moves into the background. From the first moment on, the viewer is literally bombarded with CGI. All the other special effects were handmade and were convincing because they were seamlessly integrated into the story.Įpisodes 1 through 3 had a very different approach. A forty-second sequence with the Death Star. What is generally little known: STAR WARS Episode 4 from 1977 actually featured one of the first three-dimensional CGI scenes in film history. The abbreviation stands for Computer Generated Imagery and refers to film material created entirely on the computer. The three prequels that were released in 1999, 20 were also box-office hits, but they were mostly badly received by fans and critics. Evil tongues may comment on this with the biting phrase “Milking the Cash Cow”, but we’re not here to judge. ![]() Given the boundless popularity of the series, it was not surprising that plans for further films were soon in the offing. As an integral part of pop culture, even today, almost forty years after the premiere, practically every child knows the heroes by their first and last names. STAR WARS has long been more than just a series of sci-fi films. STAR WARS – an endless success story? Unfortunately not … A deep fall It was no surprise that parts 2 and 3 of the saga were just as successful. Gigantic star destroyers, heated space battles, fantastic landscapes of faraway planets, the famous (and at times annoying) humanoid robots … All this and much more accumulated to a firework of innovation and was so convincing that the moviegoers were left with open mouths in their armchairs. Never before had anything comparable been admired on the screen. Almost equally important were the groundbreaking visual effects. It was only partly responsible for the insane success of the franchise. ![]() The space opera by the renowned director George Lucas offered everything the audience expected: suspense, drama, action and even a dash of romance.īut the film’s plot wasn’t really revolutionary. In the months following, an earthquake struck the global cinema landscape. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |